I believe a person’s writing is defined by and closely correlated to the type of materials this person likes to read or watch. For me mainly, I am a tech enthusiast and a person with great curiosity. That’s why the materials that I tend to watch and read online are closely related to explaining how something works and the reasoning behind why it works this way. One example of that would be my communication emails with my past colleagues. When I type out an email, it is typically my norm to go to a significant length explaining my point of view backed with statistical data, and at the same time, proving that my intentions are bias-free and harmless without sounding contradictory or conflictive. Suppose an email recipient is a non-technical person. In that case, I will usually try my best to explain the technical aspects within my conclusions in the most easily understandable layman’s terms to help further support my view. Another unique writing behavior that I exhibit is my strict attention to historical accuracy and context. After all, any conclusions drawn based on only and solely an opinion may inadvertently mislead your reader into believing something that you were not trying to advocate or prove. Such writing behavior could also leave your reader confused, frustrated, questioning your findings, and imminently reducing your creditability in the future.